Jonah, man, I love you, but that’s not what freedom of press means.

5 Comments | Posted: December 23rd, 2008 | Filed under: Think About It Won't You | Tags: ,

No points for guessing who.

Also, realizing that riots sell newspapers and that you’ve got a story while you’re in the middle of one? Awesome.

Share This Post:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Ping.fm
  • Twitter
  • Tumblr

5 Comments on “Jonah, man, I love you, but that’s not what freedom of press means.”

  1. 1 Ken Lowery said at 12:16 pm on December 23rd, 2008:

    Seems to have the same grasp of Freedom of Press that Palin had for Freedom of Speech.

  2. 2 Jeff Stolarcyk said at 12:23 pm on December 23rd, 2008:

    He can see the Fourth Estate from his house!

  3. 3 Benjamin Birdie said at 12:31 pm on December 23rd, 2008:

    “Can’t be part of the story…sorry…can’t be part of the story.”

  4. 4 MW said at 12:46 pm on December 23rd, 2008:

    I can say from experience that any time a news reporter or editor is caught in an emergency, they all think about how great of a story it is. The freedom of the press thing, not so much.

  5. 5 Bully said at 5:28 pm on December 24th, 2008:

    Am I correct in assuming that this riot wouldn’t have happened if Spider-Man didn’t exist?