8 Comments on “WATCHMEN 2.”

1. 1 Mark Clapham said at 12:42 pm on February 4th, 2010:

   Very possibly. Although it would be a borderline negligent business that didn’t at least float the possibility of doing something more with such a big property. In every possible artistic and critical respect it would be a dumb move, but in business terms?

2. 2 Casey Bohn said at 12:50 pm on February 4th, 2010:

   Seems to me like the epitome of something-from-nothing hype.

3. 3 Pariah Burke said at 12:50 pm on February 4th, 2010:

   Say what? Are there rumors of a sequel? What inspired this garrulous post?

4. 4 casey Bohn said at 12:55 pm on February 4th, 2010:

   With the restructuring of DC Entertainment and the departure of Paul Levitz, the people in charge of doing more with the “Watchmen” properties are saying “We will if we ever want to” rather than “Absolutely not.” That’s it.

5. 5 Kevin Church said at 1:09 pm on February 4th, 2010:

   Here’s some search results from news.google.com.

6. 6 Mark Clapham said at 5:17 pm on February 4th, 2010:

   It says a lot about DC right now that they could gain some serious credibility from deciding not to publish an ill-advised comic.

7. 7 John Pontoon said at 1:15 am on February 5th, 2010:

   Yeah, but like what if the Rorschach that Dr. Manhattan killed was actually a Rorschach ROBOT that he found in Ozymandias’s place? So he’s really not dead – AND NEITHER IS THE SQUID MONSTER!

   Then they fight it, see?

8. 8 Dan said at 1:26 pm on February 5th, 2010:

   Not even if it is subtitled “Ectopic Boogaloo?”