Comments on: WATCHMEN 2. http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/watchmen-2/2010/02/04/ Kevin Church writes things. Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:16:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dan http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/watchmen-2/2010/02/04/comment-page-1/#comment-8578 Dan Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:26:46 +0000 http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/?p=8319#comment-8578 Not even if it is subtitled "Ectopic Boogaloo?" Not even if it is subtitled “Ectopic Boogaloo?”

]]> By: John Pontoon http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/watchmen-2/2010/02/04/comment-page-1/#comment-8576 John Pontoon Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:15:28 +0000 http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/?p=8319#comment-8576 Yeah, but like what if the Rorschach that Dr. Manhattan killed was actually a Rorschach ROBOT that he found in Ozymandias's place? So he's really not dead - AND NEITHER IS THE SQUID MONSTER! Then they fight it, see? Yeah, but like what if the Rorschach that Dr. Manhattan killed was actually a Rorschach ROBOT that he found in Ozymandias’s place? So he’s really not dead – AND NEITHER IS THE SQUID MONSTER!

Then they fight it, see?

]]> By: Mark Clapham http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/watchmen-2/2010/02/04/comment-page-1/#comment-8573 Mark Clapham Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:17:35 +0000 http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/?p=8319#comment-8573 It says a lot about DC right now that they could gain some serious credibility from deciding not to publish an ill-advised comic. It says a lot about DC right now that they could gain some serious credibility from deciding not to publish an ill-advised comic.

]]> By: Kevin Church http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/watchmen-2/2010/02/04/comment-page-1/#comment-8571 Kevin Church Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:09:07 +0000 http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/?p=8319#comment-8571 <a HREF="http://news.google.com/news?q=watchmen%202" rel="nofollow">Here's some search results from news.google.com.</A> Here’s some search results from news.google.com.

]]> By: casey Bohn http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/watchmen-2/2010/02/04/comment-page-1/#comment-8570 casey Bohn Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:55:21 +0000 http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/?p=8319#comment-8570 With the restructuring of DC Entertainment and the departure of Paul Levitz, the people in charge of doing more with the "Watchmen" properties are saying "We will if we ever want to" rather than "Absolutely not." That's it. With the restructuring of DC Entertainment and the departure of Paul Levitz, the people in charge of doing more with the “Watchmen” properties are saying “We will if we ever want to” rather than “Absolutely not.” That’s it.

]]> By: Casey Bohn http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/watchmen-2/2010/02/04/comment-page-1/#comment-8568 Casey Bohn Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:50:59 +0000 http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/?p=8319#comment-8568 Seems to me like the epitome of something-from-nothing hype. Seems to me like the epitome of something-from-nothing hype.

]]> By: Pariah Burke http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/watchmen-2/2010/02/04/comment-page-1/#comment-8569 Pariah Burke Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:50:59 +0000 http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/?p=8319#comment-8569 Say what? Are there rumors of a sequel? What inspired this garrulous post? Say what? Are there rumors of a sequel? What inspired this garrulous post?

]]> By: Mark Clapham http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/watchmen-2/2010/02/04/comment-page-1/#comment-8567 Mark Clapham Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:42:38 +0000 http://www.beaucoupkevin.com/blog/?p=8319#comment-8567 Very possibly. Although it would be a borderline negligent business that didn't at least float the possibility of doing something more with such a big property. In every possible artistic and critical respect it would be a dumb move, but in business terms? Very possibly. Although it would be a borderline negligent business that didn’t at least float the possibility of doing something more with such a big property. In every possible artistic and critical respect it would be a dumb move, but in business terms?

]]>